Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Noelle Odessa's avatar

I considered my condition AGP from the time that I learned about it until I stopped compartmentalizing. Then, as I began to do the work of trying to integrate my interior experience through the lens of "being trans," AGP became a lot less compelling, because (1) it didn't feel sufficiently holistic or multifaced to account for the multi-dimensionality and complexity of my interior experience, and (2) I experienced a significant amount of social pressure from other trans people, who seemed to feel threatened that I was considering the term at all.

I've mostly gotten over (2). To (1), I've gained a greater appreciation for the flexibility / versatility of AGP as a heuristic, but I still find it a bit reductive and misleading. I don't mind acknowledging / exploring an AGP dimension to my experience among those for whom the theory has salience, but it's not a framing that I find particularly helpful in parsing myself to myself. I think we could do better in developing language that is more generous and fecund in helping trans people to understand their experience and narrate their identities.

Expand full comment
tailcalled's avatar

Can we at least admit it's KIND OF FUNNY your example of an HSTS isn't HSTS 😅

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts